The argumentative essay establishes that the author believes guns are more deadly than knives because "knives don't ricochet." Ivins' backs her argument using the Second Amendment. She adds that some citizens "are not a part of a well-regulated militia." Therefore, they don't need one. I agree with the author 14-year-old boys don't need a gun. A gun in their hands is destructive and life-altering. The author notes, the only persons who should hold a gun are armed forces. However, I disagree. There is no secret that there can be defence forces who misuse their weapons like people in society. Though, the author suggests that the US uses gun restrictions methods like England. She still feels that individuals think "they have the power to kill." For that reason, she argues for guns banishment and; individuals to get a dog. Overall, I can't fully agree with the author about getting rid of guns. Yes, her reasons are clear. However, she wa...